Well, you got me twice there. If anyone was a genius with the language, Shakespeare was and George Gordon, Lord Byron, invented being a rockstar, every one that followed was a mere imitation, hence still relevant. I would add, “Anyone who says they write because they have to.” and “Anyone who thinks ’spoken word’ is a modern invention when it was actually the origin of poetry.”
I aggree - “Anyone who thinks ’spoken word’ is a modern invention when it was actually the origin of poetry.” I have written about this before…It is great to read the comment of a like mind on this subject…
On the other hand Shakespeare is another matter
Hello mUSe,
Thanks for your comment - one of the things thats funny about the above list is that there have been points in time as a writer that my style of thinking and writing - was very much like one of the types described on this list…
I would love to be able to write poetry.Wouldn’t dare now.
I have enjoyed reading you’re posts,and liked your poems.- didn’t understand half of it but I’m trying.
Agree a lot with Gingatao.
Have you read a lot of Shakespeare?
Will keep looking.
Diru
I would add I hate it when people try to intellectualize poetry. Hey, if your thinking your dead and if you write without thinking then keep on writing because that is an authentic voice. Damn the critics!! Now what was I thinking! Ha ha! Great post my friend.
…i was not dead when i wrote this…somewhere though….now where was i? Yes, those horrible academics spewing rules and qualifying what is and what is not poetry…i wonder if they wrote a list too?
well mr poetman I am jumping up and down on a most indignant trampoline…….Shakespeare maligned (a god) and Keats (a god) and Byron (demi-god), though I agree with many of the rest…….. you got me mad, lucky I like you (laughing and spluttering alternately).
Now jo, think of your heart - I don’t know, jumping up and down and all might not be wise…
I wrote this as an iconoclastic bombast back in the early days of my blog…I was trying to get attention…I guess it worked…although it took a while….please forgive me - instead of critiquing his genius (which I agree he has) I should have wrote that I don’t like reading him - I am no fan of trying to parse the style of his english…perhaps that speaks more about my genius…than his…be well and thanks…
For some reason you remind me of one of the masses that go in the saying
“How many photographers does it take to take a picture.
50.
One to take the picture and 49 to say I could have done that”.
I guess it’s true in all aspects of life to which people usually verbalise their opinions about their peers or others in general then concentrating and Doing vs. chastising.
For some reason I use to think poets were immune from this iffliction.
Guess not.
m6fan - so I guess 49 others elected you as their spokesperson…nice critique of my tongue in cheek…perhaps you should stick to your photographs - which by the way are awesome…
"You know you’re a great poet. You just like basking in a soft, feature-enhancing spotlight (as we all do). Unlike those people (some writers who love basking in the spotlight for Narcissistic reasons), you actually deserve to bask in a soft glow because your poetry has a delicate architecture that is best highlighted intimately…carefully…lovingly. Ever since starting this blog, you have truly honed and honoured your craft with dignity."
October 4, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Well, you got me twice there. If anyone was a genius with the language, Shakespeare was and George Gordon, Lord Byron, invented being a rockstar, every one that followed was a mere imitation, hence still relevant. I would add, “Anyone who says they write because they have to.” and “Anyone who thinks ’spoken word’ is a modern invention when it was actually the origin of poetry.”
October 5, 2007 at 7:42 am
Snort, Snigger, Snicker. Loved #s 3, 11, 13, & particularly 14–amen, brother. Don’t know about Shakespeare.
Lately I’ve learned the last lacks legitimacy. lol
October 5, 2007 at 2:21 pm
gingatao — Thank You
I aggree - “Anyone who thinks ’spoken word’ is a modern invention when it was actually the origin of poetry.” I have written about this before…It is great to read the comment of a like mind on this subject…
On the other hand Shakespeare is another matter
Hello mUSe,
Thanks for your comment - one of the things thats funny about the above list is that there have been points in time as a writer that my style of thinking and writing - was very much like one of the types described on this list…
Poetman
October 5, 2007 at 4:59 pm
haha .. these are good. How about ’someone who has a poetry blog who doesn’t consider herself a poet.’?
Blessings,
Scotti
October 9, 2007 at 4:36 pm
I would love to be able to write poetry.Wouldn’t dare now.
I have enjoyed reading you’re posts,and liked your poems.- didn’t understand half of it but I’m trying.
Agree a lot with Gingatao.
Have you read a lot of Shakespeare?
Will keep looking.
Diru
December 16, 2007 at 3:24 pm
I would add I hate it when people try to intellectualize poetry. Hey, if your thinking your dead and if you write without thinking then keep on writing because that is an authentic voice. Damn the critics!! Now what was I thinking! Ha ha! Great post my friend.
December 17, 2007 at 8:58 pm
…i was not dead when i wrote this…somewhere though….now where was i? Yes, those horrible academics spewing rules and qualifying what is and what is not poetry…i wonder if they wrote a list too?
December 17, 2007 at 9:47 pm
Love the list, Poetman… especially #20, a problem for which I’ve long lusted lasciviously.
December 18, 2007 at 6:18 am
Bob - last light longs for luminance like the lazy alliterating laureate…
January 5, 2008 at 12:55 pm
well mr poetman I am jumping up and down on a most indignant trampoline…….Shakespeare maligned (a god) and Keats (a god) and Byron (demi-god), though I agree with many of the rest…….. you got me mad, lucky I like you (laughing and spluttering alternately).
January 6, 2008 at 3:56 am
Now jo, think of your heart - I don’t know, jumping up and down and all might not be wise…
I wrote this as an iconoclastic bombast back in the early days of my blog…I was trying to get attention…I guess it worked…although it took a while….please forgive me - instead of critiquing his genius (which I agree he has) I should have wrote that I don’t like reading him - I am no fan of trying to parse the style of his english…perhaps that speaks more about my genius…than his…be well and thanks…
January 6, 2008 at 1:03 pm
For some reason you remind me of one of the masses that go in the saying
“How many photographers does it take to take a picture.
50.
One to take the picture and 49 to say I could have done that”.
I guess it’s true in all aspects of life to which people usually verbalise their opinions about their peers or others in general then concentrating and Doing vs. chastising.
For some reason I use to think poets were immune from this iffliction.
Guess not.
January 6, 2008 at 1:33 pm
m6fan - so I guess 49 others elected you as their spokesperson…nice critique of my tongue in cheek…perhaps you should stick to your photographs - which by the way are awesome…
January 10, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Tee Hee (That is all I could come up with.) Your poem is great made me twist a smile (:
January 10, 2008 at 8:38 pm
I mean list thingy ha ha
February 15, 2008 at 1:12 am
Ha, Ha, definitely an interesting list. #4, 11, 19 has me thinking you’ve been reading my blog. I think I’ll be back..